Volume 14, Number 5

Subverting Characters Stereotypes: Exploring the Role of AI in Stereotype Subversion

  Authors

Xiaohan Feng and Makoto Murakami, Toyo University, Kawagoe, Japan

  Abstract

The Aim of this paper is to explore different ways of using AI to subvert stereotypes more efficiently and effectively. It will also enumerate the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, helping creators select the most appropriate method for their specific situations. AI opens up new possibilities, enabling anyone to effortlessly generate visually stunning images without the need for artistic skills. However, it also leads to the creation of more stereotypes when using large amounts of data. Consequently, stereotypes are becoming more prevalent and serious than ever before. Our belief is that we can use this situation in reverse, aiming to summarize stereotypes with AI and then subvert them through elemental exchange. In this study, we have attempted to develop a less time-consuming method to challenge character stereotypes while embracing the concept of "exchange." We selected two character archetypes, namely the "tyrant" and the "mad scientist," and summarized their stereotypes by generating AI images or asking ChatGPT questions. Additionally, we conducted a survey of real historical tyrants to gain insights into their behavior and characteristics. This step helped us comprehend the reasons behind stereotyping in artwork depicting tyrants. Based on this understanding, we made choices about which stereotypes to retain. The intention was to empower the audience to better evaluate the identity of the character. Finally, the two remaining character stereotypes were exchanged, and the design was completed. This paper documents the last and most time-consuming method. By examining a large number of sources and examining what stereotypical influences were used, we were able to achieve a greater effect of subverting stereotypes. The other method is much less time-consuming but somewhat more random. Whether one chooses by subjective experience or by the most frequent choices, there is no guarantee of the best outcome. In other words, it is the one that best guarantees that the audience will be able to quickly identify the original character and at the same time move the two characters the furthest away from the original stereotypical image of the original. In conclusion, if the designer has sufficient time, ai portrait + research or chatGPT + research can be chosen. If there is not enough time, the remaining methods can be chosen. The remaining methods take less time and the designer can try them all to get the desired result.

  Keywords

Multidisciplinary, Artificial Intelligence, Arts & Design History, Stereotypes